Docs Reveal TSA Plan To Body-Scan Pedestrians, Train Passengers

Alan Greenberg
Forbes

Giving Transportation Security Administration agents a peek under your clothes may soon be a practice that goes well beyond airport checkpoints. Newly uncovered documents show that as early as 2006, the Department of Homeland Security has been planning pilot programs to deploy mobile scanning units that can be set up at public events and in train stations, along with mobile x-ray vans capable of scanning pedestrians on city streets.

The non-profit Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) on Wednesday published documents it obtained from the Department of Homeland Security showing that from 2006 to 2008 the agency planned a study of of new anti-terrorism technologies that EPIC believes raise serious privacy concerns. The projects range from what the DHS describes as “a walk through x-ray screening system that could be deployed at entrances to special events or other points of interest” to “covert inspection of moving subjects” employing the same backscatter imaging technology currently used in American airports.

The 173-page collection of contracts and reports, acquired through a Freedom of Information Act request, includes contracts with Siemens Corporations, Northeastern University, and Rapiscan Systems. The study was expected to cost more than $3.5 million.

One project allocated to Northeastern University and Siemens would mount backscatter x-ray scanners and video cameras on roving vans, along with other cameras on buildings and utility poles, to monitor groups of pedestrians and assess what they carried. In another program, the researchers were asked to develop a system of long range x-ray scanning to determine what metal objects an individual might have on his or her body at distances up to thirty feet.

“This would allow them to take these technologies out of the airport and into other contexts like public streets, special events and ground transit,” says Ginger McCall, an attorney with EPIC. “It’s a clear violation of the fourth amendment that’s very invasive, not necessarily effective, and poses all the same radiation risks as the airport scans.”

Read Full Article

Related Posts

Are Air Travelers Criminal Suspects? by Ron Paul The growing revolt against invasive TSA practices is encouraging to Americans who are fed up with federal government encroachment i...
TSA Abuses and Failures Congressman Ron Paul 7.5.11 The press reports are horrifying: 95 year-old women humiliated; children molested; disabled people abused; men and w...
TSA abuse: 17,000 and counting WENDY THOMSON TSANewsBlog November 22, 2012 17,000 formal complaints have been filed about TSA “enhanced” pat-downs since 2009, according to a...
U.S. officials defend new airport screening proced... Jeremy Pelofsky Reuters Monday, November 15, 2010 (Reuters) - Homeland security officials on Monday defended heightened airport security screen...
Bill Would Make Some Airport Screening Sexual Assa... WMUR9.com March 1st, 2011 CONCORD, N.H. — Lawmakers and residents engaged in heated debate Tuesday over a bill that would make random airport se...

Comments are closed.