Supreme Court: Police need warrant to use GPS tracking on cars

LA Times
January 23, 2012

The Supreme Court on Monday put the brakes on the government’s use of high-tech monitoring devices to track motorists, ruling unanimously that police and the FBI violated the 4th Amendment by attaching a GPS device to a Jeep owned by a drug suspect.

The justices all agreed that the government needs a search warrant from a judge before it seeks to track a suspect by secretly installing a device on his car.

They were divided, however, as to what level of tracking would require a search warrant. Justice Antonin Scalia, speaking for a five-member majority, said the police erred because they attached the tiny device to the vehicle. He said the 4th Amendment was intended to protect against government searches on private property.

“We hold that the government’s installation of a GPS device on a target’s vehicle, and its use of that device to monitor the vehicle’s movements, constitutes a ‘search,’” Scalia said. “The government physically occupied private property for the purpose of obtaining information,” he said.

Full article here

Related Posts

Supreme Court Ruling Allows Strip-Searches for Any... ADAM LIPTAK NY Times April 3, 2012 WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that officials may strip-search people arres...
The Supreme Court and Obamacare Ron Paul Tuesday, April 3, 2012 Last week the Supreme Court heard arguments concerning the constitutionality of the Obamacare ...
Rand Paul to Sue the Government Over NSA Spying 6.9.13 Activist Post Kentucky Senator Rand Paul took to Fox News Sunday to declare his legal opposition to the NSA's surveillance programs. "I'm...
Obama Administration Weighs Indefinite Detention by DINA TEMPLE-RASTON November 24, 2010 It is starting to look like the president who campaigned on closing the prison at Guantanamo Bay may...

Comments are closed.